Opener Lab

EARST vs SLANT

See which word leaves you with the easier game.

SLANT leads in the previous complete six-turn benchmark

These game-length figures come from the previous complete opener benchmark against its 2,354-answer snapshot, ranked by average guesses among games solved within six. Its answer snapshot and continuation policy are separate from today's solver recommendations.

The same solver played from both openers. SLANT has the lower average in games solved within six: 3.51 guesses to 3.55 for EARST.

Looking only at the opening row, EARST has higher entropy (5.76 bits versus 5.49). That describes first-guess separation, not the full solve on its own.

One thing EARST does better is damage control. Its worst feedback pattern leaves 234 possible answers, while SLANT can be left staring at 326.

MetricEARSTSLANT
Elimination96.7%95.7%
Information5.76 bits5.49 bits
Avg remaining78 words101 words
Avg turns3.553.51
Win rate99.8%99.9%
TierAA

What to expect from the first guess

OutcomeEARSTSLANT
First-turn solve* 0% 0.04%
At least one green 35.2% 41.5%
Any green or yellow 90.1% 86.2%
Whole row gray 9.9% 13.8%
Worst case answers left 234 326

*Treating every word in the possible-answer list as equally likely.

A fully gray row is rarer with EARST: it happens 9.9% of the time, against 13.8% for SLANT.

EARST is not on the possible-answer list, so it cannot solve the game on turn one here. It can still be a useful guess.

How these two openers fit together

EARST and SLANT share 3 letters (A, S, T). Played as a pair they cover 7 distinct letters, which still gives the second word room to do useful work.

Played back to back, EARST then SLANT earns 7.78 bits of information in total, 2.02 bits more than the better word manages alone.

Past Wordle answers

  • EARST: Has not been a past Wordle answer in this site's history.
  • SLANT: Has not been a past Wordle answer in this site's history.