Opener Lab

PAWKS vs SLANT

See which word leaves you with the easier game.

SLANT leads in the previous complete six-turn benchmark

These game-length figures come from the previous complete opener benchmark against its 2,354-answer snapshot, ranked by average guesses among games solved within six. Its answer snapshot and continuation policy are separate from today's solver recommendations.

The same solver played from both openers. SLANT has the lower average in games solved within six: 3.51 guesses to 3.76 for PAWKS.

Looking only at the opening row, SLANT has higher entropy (5.49 bits versus 3.90). That describes first-guess separation, not the full solve on its own.

PAWKS does keep one card: in full solver playouts it finishes inside six guesses 100.0% of the time, a shade ahead of SLANT at 99.9%.

MetricPAWKSSLANT
Elimination86.4%95.7%
Information3.90 bits5.49 bits
Avg remaining320 words101 words
Avg turns3.763.51
Win rate100.0%99.9%
TierFA

What to expect from the first guess

OutcomePAWKSSLANT
First-turn solve* 0% 0.04%
At least one green 22.7% 41.5%
Any green or yellow 69.4% 86.2%
Whole row gray 30.6% 13.8%
Worst case answers left 721 326

*Treating every word in the possible-answer list as equally likely.

A fully gray row is rarer with SLANT: it happens 13.8% of the time, against 30.6% for PAWKS.

PAWKS is not on the possible-answer list, so it cannot solve the game on turn one here. It can still be a useful guess.

How these two openers fit together

PAWKS and SLANT share 2 letters (A, S). Played as a pair they cover 8 distinct letters, which still gives the second word room to do useful work.

Played back to back, PAWKS then SLANT earns 7.16 bits of information in total, 1.67 bits more than the better word manages alone.

Past Wordle answers

  • PAWKS: Has not been a past Wordle answer in this site's history.
  • SLANT: Has not been a past Wordle answer in this site's history.